KernelSU and Magisk are two popular root solutions for Android devices. KernelSU is a kernel-based root solution that modifies the kernel source code to grant root access. Magisk is a systemless root solution that modifies the boot image without altering core system files.
KernelSU has been gaining popularity in recent years due to its simplicity and reliability. It is a good choice for users who want a root solution that is easy to use and does not require any additional modules. KernelSU can also bypass SafetyNet bacause it kernel-based root solution, making it a good choice for users who want to use root-enabled apps that require SafetyNet access.
Magisk is another popular root solution that offers a wider range of features than KernelSU. Magisk can be used to hide root from apps, install custom modules, and modify system files without affecting the boot image. Magisk is also more compatible with newer devices than KernelSU.
Ultimately, the best root solution for you will depend on your specific needs and requirements. If you are looking for a simple and reliable root solution that is easy to use, then KernelSU is a good choice. If you are looking for a root solution with more features and flexibility, then Magisk is a better option.
Table of Contents
What is KernelSU?
KernelSU is a kernel-based root solution for Android devices that can be used on any device, regardless of the kernel version. However, if the device is running a kernel that is not supported by KernelSU, then the user is not able to use the KernelSU.
What is Magisk?
Magisk is a popular systemless root solution for Android. It modifies the device’s boot image and allows the installation of Magisk modules, which can add features, modify system behavior, or bypass SafetyNet checks. Magisk has a thriving community and extensive module support.
KernelSU vs Magisk
Here’s a detailed comparison of KernelSU and Magisk:
|Functionality||Kernel-based solution||Systemless root|
|Compatibility||Wider device support||Wider device support|
|Safety Measures||Whitelist access control, SELinux bypass||MagiskHide, systemless modifications|
|SafetyNet Bypass||Automatic pass||Varies depending on device and setup|
|Module Ecosystem||Limited module support||Extensive module support|
|Community Support||Growing community||Strong community presence|
|Installation Process||Requires kernel source integration and compilation||Boot image modification|
|Root Access Management||Managed through KernelSU App||Managed through Magisk App|
My Personal Experience: Magisk vs. KernelSU
I have used both KernelSU and Magisk, and I prefer Magisk for the following reasons:
- Magisk has a broader device support range than KernelSU. This means that it is more likely to work on your device, even if it is an older or less popular model.
- Magisk has an extensive module ecosystem. This means that there are many different modules available that can be used to customize your device and add new features.
- Magisk can be used to bypass SafetyNet on most devices. This is important if you want to use root-enabled apps that require SafetyNet access.
Overall, I think Magisk is the better root solution because it is more versatile and reliable than KernelSU. If you are looking for a root solution that will work on your device and give you access to a wide range of features, then I recommend Magisk.
In this blog, we discussed two popular root solutions for Android devices: KernelSU and Magisk. KernelSU is a kernel-based root solution that can be used on any device, regardless of the kernel version. However, if the device is running a kernel that is not supported by KernelSU, then the user may not be able to use KernelSU. Magisk offers a broader device support range and an extensive module ecosystem, but it may not be able to bypass SafetyNet on all devices.
Ultimately, the best root solution for you will depend on your specific needs and requirements. If you are looking for a root solution that is compatible with any device and can bypass SafetyNet, then KernelSU is a good option. If you are looking for a root solution with a broader device support range and an extensive module ecosystem, then Magisk is a better choice.